Does ChatGPT generated Content have any disadvantage?

Does ChatGPT generated Content have any disadvantage?

ChatGPT – the latest buzzword, has shaken the kingdom of Google for the past few days. Almost every netizen, no matter from which field they belong is well aware of this AI backed application that is capable of producing any sort of content or coding.
We are all aware that artificial intelligence is the future. ChatGPT is a chatbot/trained-model designed by OpenAI that is still being developed and trained by its developers. It can produce human-like text in a variety of styles and formats, including answering questions, writing stories, and even coding. It was developed on a big dataset of text from the internet using a deep learning technique called transformer architecture. It can be used for text production, conversation simulation, and other natural language processing applications.

How Does ChatGPT Function?

Let us look at how ChatGPT works now that we know what it is. ChatGPT is a big language model based on GPT3 and GPT 3.5 at its core. This AI application employs machine learning algorithms on a vast corpus of text to react to user inquiries in language that is eerily human-like. ChatGPT, according to OpenAI, improves its capabilities through reinforcement learning, which is dependent on human feedback. The company engages human AI trainers to interact with the model while pretending to be both a user and a chatbot. Trainers compare ChatGPT responses to human responses and rate their quality to reinforce human-like conversation tactics.
Now the concern is that this magic tool named ChatGPT has the capacity to produce anything. Many people are already worried about the quality of content it is producing. So, here we will focus on the disadvantages of the content produced by ChatGPT.

Disadvantages of ChatGPT

Despite the fact that the Internet’s favorite ChatGPT has grown in popularity since its start. However, we discovered certain flaws in OpenAI’s most recent creation. You may have ignored several downsides of ChatGPT generated content. This article highlights the top ten downsides of ChatGPT content.

The use of phrases identifies it as non-human- Researchers looking into how to detect machine-generated content uncovered patterns that made it sound unnatural. One of these peculiarities is AI’s difficulty with idioms. An idiom is a statement or saying with a figurative meaning, such as “every cloud has a silver lining.” A lack of idioms in a piece of text can indicate that it is machine-generated, and this can be used as part of a detection algorithm. Because of this inability to use idioms, ChatGPT output sounds and reads unnaturally.
ChatGPT lacks expression capability- An artist commented on how ChatGPT’s output resembles art but lacks the true qualities of artistic expression. The act of communicating thoughts or feelings is known as expression. Only words are used in ChatGPT output, no expressions. Because it lacks true thoughts and feelings, it cannot create content that emotionally connects with people on the same level that humans can.
ChatGPT does not generate insights- According to an article published in The Insider, an expert stated that academic articles written by ChatGPT lack insight into the issue. ChatGPT describes the issue but does not provide a new perspective on it. Humans develop not only via information but also through personal experience and subjective impressions. Insight is the characteristic of a well-written essay, and ChatGPT is not very adept at it. This lack of insight should be considered while evaluating machine-generated content.
ChatGPT is excessively wordy– A study article published in January 2023 revealed trends in ChatGPT content that render it unsuitable for crucial applications. How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? is the title of the paper. According to the study, people favored ChatGPT answers in more than half of the finance and psychology questions. However, ChatGPT failed to answer medical inquiries because humans sought direct responses, which the AI did not supply. ChatGPT has a tendency to approach a problem from various perspectives, which makes it inappropriate when the best solution is a direct one.
The ChatGPT content is well-organized and follows a logical progression-
ChatGPT’s writing style is not just verbose, but it also tends to follow a pattern, giving the content an artificially unique style. The contrasts in how people and machines respond to questions demonstrate this inhuman nature.
ChatGPT is excessively detailed and extensive- ChatGPT was trained in such a way that when people were satisfied with the answer, the computer was rewarded. Human raters tended to prefer more detailed answers. However, in other cases, such as in a medical setting, a direct answer is preferable to a detailed one. That is, when those attributes are important, the machine must be taught to be less thorough and more direct.
ChatGPT Lies- According to the aforementioned research article, How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? ChatGPT has a tendency to lie. It claims that while answering a question requiring professional knowledge from a certain sector, ChatGPT may fake facts in order to provide an answer.For example, in response to legal questions, ChatGPT may generate some non-existent legal provisions. Furthermore, when a user asks a question for which there is no known answer, ChatGPT may invent facts in order to produce a response. One issue with human review is that ChatGPT content is designed to seem convincingly correct, which may mislead a reviewer who is not a subject matter expert.
ChatGPT is unnatural because it is not divergent- The study, How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? It was also recognised that human speech might have indirect meaning, which necessitates a change in topic to understand. ChatGPT is overly literal, which causes answers to occasionally miss the mark since the AI ignores the actual issue. Humans are better at deviating from literal queries, which is vital when answering “what about” questions.
ChatGPT is preconditioned to being formal- ChatGPT output has a bias that stops it from loosening up and responding with natural language. Instead, its responses are typically formal. Humans, on the other hand, respond to inquiries in a more colloquial manner, employing daily language and slang – the extreme opposite of formal. ChatGPT does not employ abbreviations such as GOAT or TL;DR. The responses also lack sarcasm, analogies, and comedy, which might make ChatGPT content appear too professional for various topics.
ChatGPT is still undergoing training- ChatGPT is still in the process of being trained and improved. As a best practice, OpenAI suggests that all content generated by ChatGPT be evaluated by a human.

How to prevent ChatGPT from accessing your website content?

Since ChatGPT does not actively crawl websites for data, it is currently not possible to prevent ChatGPT from crawling or utilizing your site content. For training, it employs historical data collected by third-party and open-source website crawlers. Wikipedia, Free Books, WebText2, Reddit Content, Common Crawl, and other well-known data sources are used to train ChatGPT. If ChatGPT begins crawling websites for real-time data, such as news information, we will most likely know the unique ChatGPT crawler or bot name.


There are numerous flaws with ChatGPT that make it unsuitable for unsupervised content production. It has biases and does not produce content that feels natural or has true insights. Furthermore, its incapacity to feel or generate creative thoughts makes it an unsuitable candidate for developing aesthetic expressions. Users should use comprehensive instructions to build content that is superior to the default content it produces. Finally, human evaluation of machine-generated information is not always sufficient, as ChatGPT content is meant to appear correct even when it is not. This means that human reviewers must be subject-matter experts who can distinguish between correct and wrong content on a certain issue.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.